Examining students’ music listening willingness and engagement to foster their musical achievement and development in higher educational institutions

Examining students’ music listening willingness and engagement to foster their musical achievement and development in higher educational institutions


  • Gore, J. M., Miller, A., Fray, L., Harris, J. & Prieto, E. Improving student achievement through professional development: Results from a randomised controlled trial of Quality Teaching Rounds. Teach. Teach. Educ. 101, 103297 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Becker, M., Kocaj, A., Jansen, M., Dumont, H. & Lüdtke, O. Class-average achievement and individual achievement development: Testing achievement composition and peer spillover effects using five German longitudinal studies. J. Educ. Psychol. 114, 177 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Conaghan, D. Instrumental music education in Ireland: How subsidiarity and choice can perpetuate structural inequalities. Irish Educ. Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2022.2093255 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Du, J. & Leung, B.-W. The sustainability of multicultural music education in Guizhou Province, China. Int. J. Music Educ. 40, 131–148 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, N. Analysis on improvement of comprehensive competency in undergraduates by music education. Educ. Sci. Theory Pract. 18, 2062–2068 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Freer, E. & Evans, P. Choosing to study music in high school: Teacher support, psychological needs satisfaction, and elective music intentions. Psychol. Music 47, 781–799 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Behbehani, S. & Steffens, J. Musical DIAMONDS: The influence of situational classes and characteristics on music listening behavior. Psychol. Music 49, 1532–1545 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gallardo, I., Iturra, C., Bustamante, M., Pérez, I. & Clavijo, M. Empirically based decisions: The effect of musical and humanistic activities on self-efficacy and student academic performance. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.) 26, 105–112 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oliveira, A., McPherson, G., Mota Ribeiro, L. & Oliveira-Silva, P. Musical achievement during a lockdown: The parental support miracle. Res. Stud. Music Educ. 45, 211–226 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Loepthien, T. & Leipold, B. Flow in music performance and music-listening: Differences in intensity, predictors, and the relationship between flow and subjective well-being. Psychol. Music 50, 111–126 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schäfer, K. & Eerola, T. How listening to music and engagement with other media provide a sense of belonging: An exploratory study of social surrogacy. Psychol. Music 48, 232–251 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cuny, C., Fornerino, M. & Helme-Guizon, A. Can music improve e-behavioral intentions by enhancing consumers’ immersion and experience?. Inf. Manag. 52, 1025–1034 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reybrouck, M., Vuust, P. & Brattico, E. Neural correlates of music listening: Does the music matter?. Brain Sci. 11, 1553 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Urruzola, M.-V. & Bernaras, E. Music performance anxiety in 8-to 12-year-old children. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.) 25, 76–83 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jian, Z. Sustainable engagement and academic achievement under impact of academic self-efficacy through mediation of learning agility—evidence from music education students. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899706 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Faran, M., Akram, S., Tahir, N. & Malik, F. Uses of Music and Flourish: Mediating Role of Emotion Regulation in University Students (2021).

  • Hwang, A.H.-C. & Oh, J. Interacting with background music engages E-Customers more: The impact of interactive music on consumer perception and behavioral intention. J. Retail. Consumer Serv. 54, 101928 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Halliday, A. J. Bridging music and organizational psychology: Everyday music uses and preferences and the prediction of organizational behaviour. Pers. Individ. Differ. 139, 263–276 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Müllensiefen, D., Harrison, P., Caprini, F. & Fancourt, A. Investigating the importance of self-theories of intelligence and musicality for students’ academic and musical achievement. Front. Psychol. 6, 1702 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leung, M. C. & Cheung, R. Y. Music engagement and well-being in Chinese adolescents: Emotional awareness, positive emotions, and negative emotions as mediating processes. Psychol. Music 48, 105–119 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koehler, F., Warth, M., Ditzen, B. & Neubauer, A. B. Motivation to make music matters: Daily autonomous motivation, flow, and well-being in hobby musicians. Psychol. Aesthet. Creativity Arts 17, 682–693 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brattico, E., Bogert, B. & Jacobsen, T. Toward a neural chronometry for the aesthetic experience of music. Front. Psychol. 4, 206 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Faran, M., Akram, S., Tahir, N. & Malik, F. Uses of music and flourish: mediating role of emotion regulation in university students. J. Behav. Sci. 31, 25 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Greb, F., Steffens, J. & Schlotz, W. Modeling music-selection behavior in everyday life: A multilevel statistical learning approach and mediation analysis of experience sampling data. Front. Psychol. 10, 390 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Redman, D. J. & Bugos, J. A. Motivational factors in adult, auditioned community choirs: The power of aesthetic experiences. Psychol. Music 47, 694–705 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, J., Lin, P. & Hoffman, E. Music major, affects, and positive music listening experience. Psychol. Music 49, 841–854 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. Optimizing students’ motivation in the era of testing and pressure: A self-determination theory perspective. In Building Autonomous Learners: Perspectives from Research and Practice Using Self-Determination Theory, 9–29 (2016).

  • Santana-Monagas, E., Putwain, D. W., Núnez, J. L., Loro, J. F. & León, J. Do teachers’ engaging messages predict motivation to learn and performance?. Revista De Psicodidáctica (English Ed.) 27, 86–95 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. “Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains”: Correction to Deci and Ryan. (2008).

  • Groarke, J. M. & Hogan, M. J. Development and psychometric evaluation of the adaptive functions of music listening scale. Front. Psychol. 9, 516 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Giordano, F. et al. Receptive music therapy to reduce stress and improve wellbeing in Italian clinical staff involved in COVID-19 pandemic: A preliminary study. Arts Psychother. 70, 101688 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vajpeyee, M. et al. Yoga and music intervention to reduce depression, anxiety, and stress during COVID-19 outbreak on healthcare workers. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 68, 798–807 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Krause, A. E., Dimmock, J., Rebar, A. L. & Jackson, B. Music listening predicted improved life satisfaction in university students during early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Psychol. 11, 631033 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Malhotra, N. K. Essentials of Marketing Research: A Hands-on Orientation (Pearson Essex, 2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Sage Publications, 2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Cheng, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, Y. & Yan, Z. Open collaboration between universities and enterprises: A case study on GitHub. Internet Res. 30, 1251–1279 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dai, B., Ali, A. & Wang, H. Exploring information avoidance intention of social media users: A cognition–affect–conation perspective. Internet Res. 30, 1455–1478 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yassin, A. A., Razak, N. A., Saeed, M. A., Al-Maliki, M. A. A. & Al-Habies, F. A. Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on local and international students in Malaysian universities. Asian Educ. Dev. Stud. 10, 574–586 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yoo, B. & Donthu, N. Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. J. Bus. Res. 52, 1–14 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, D. J. A study of the multilevel and dynamic nature of trust in e-commerce from a cross-stage perspective. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 19, 11–64 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Comrey, A. L., Backer, T. E. & Glaser, E. M. A sourcebook for mental health measures. (1973).

  • Worthington, R. L. & Whittaker, T. A. Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Couns. Psychol. 34, 806–838 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Plan. 46, 1–12 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hair, J. F. Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (Sage Publications, 2021).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Soper, D. (2021).

  • Westland, J. C. Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electron. Commerce Res. Appl. 9, 476–487 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vidas, D., Nelson, N. L. & Dingle, G. A. Music listening as a coping resource in domestic and international university students. Psychol. Music 50, 1816–1836 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosenberg, N., Greenberg, D. M. & Lamb, M. E. Musical engagement is linked to posttraumatic resilience: The role of gender, personality, and music listening styles after childhood trauma. Music Sci. 4, 2059204321993731 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Taherdoost, H. What is the best response scale for survey and questionnaire design; review of different lengths of rating scale/attitude scale/Likert scale. Int. J. Acad. Res. Manag. 8, 1–12 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ramli, N. A., Latan, H. & Nartea, G. V. Why should PLS-SEM be used rather than regression? Evidence from the capital structure perspective. In Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Recent Advances in Banking and Finance, 171–209 (2018).

  • Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. Assessing Mediation in Communication Research (The Sage Sourcebook of Advanced Data Analysis Methods for Communication, 2008).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hinkin, T. R. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organ. Res. Methods 1, 104–121 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. & Anderson, R. Exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate data analysis, 7th Pearson new international ed. (Pearson Education, 2014).

  • Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103, 411 (1988).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kline, R. B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Guilford Publications, 2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Teo, T. & Zhou, M. Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: A structural equation modeling approach. J. Comput. High. Educ. 26, 124–142 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chin, W. W. vii-xvi (JSTOR, 1998).

  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51, 1173 (1986).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L. & Petty, R. E. Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 5, 359–371 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Armstrong, J. S. & Overton, T. S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Market. Res. 14, 396–402 (1977).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, L. & Fu, L. Let’s fight the infodemic: The third-person effect process of misinformation during public health emergencies. Internet Res. 32, 1357–1377 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moqbel, M., Bartelt, V. L., Topuz, K. & Gehrt, K. L. Enterprise social media: Combating turnover in businesses. Internet Res. 30, 591–610 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abraham, V., Bremser, K., Carreno, M., Crowley-Cyr, L. & Moreno, M. Exploring the consequences of COVID-19 on tourist behaviors: Perceived travel risk, animosity and intentions to travel. Tour. Rev. 76, 701–717 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bhukya, R. & Singh, S. The effect of perceived risk dimensions on purchase intention: An empirical evidence from Indian private labels market. Am. J. Bus. 30, 218–230 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J. & Wasserman, W. Applied Linear Regression Models Vol. 4 (McGraw-Hill/Irwin New York, 2004).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Koufteros, X. A. Testing a model of pull production: A paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling. J. Oper. Manag. 17, 467–488 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W. & Sugawara, H. M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol. Methods 1, 130 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sinkovics, R. R. New Challenges to International Marketing (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2009).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 43, 115–135 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50 (1981).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hair, J., Black, B., Babin, B. & Anderson, R. Multivariate Data Analysis 7th edn, 629–686 (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rehman, S.-U., Mohamed, R. & Ayoup, H. The mediating role of organizational capabilities between organizational performance and its determinants. J. Glob. Entrepreneurship Res. 9, 1–23 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 6, 1–55 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kamalzadeh, M., Baur, D. & Möller, T. Listen or interact? A large-scale survey on music listening and management behaviours. J. New Music Res. 45, 42–67 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hallam, S. The power of music: Its impact on the intellectual, social and personal development of children and young people. Int. J. Music Educ. 28, 269–289 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mohan, A. & Thomas, E. Effect of background music and the cultural preference to music on adolescents’ task performance. Int. J. Adolesc. Youth 25, 562–573 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dingle, G. A. et al. How do music activities affect health and well-being? A scoping review of studies examining psychosocial mechanisms. Front. Psychol. 12, 3689 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nichols, B. E. & Springer, D. G. Interval identification predicts success in melodic dictation. J. Res. Music Educ. 70, 109–126 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Loveday, C., Musgrave, G. & Gross, S.-A. Predicting anxiety, depression, and wellbeing in professional and nonprofessional musicians. Psychol. Music 51, 508–522 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Musgrave, G. Music and wellbeing vs. musicians’ wellbeing: examining the paradox of music-making positively impacting wellbeing, but musicians suffering from poor mental health. Cult. Trends 32, 280–295 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Read More