The influence of university library environment on student interactions and college students’ learning engagement

The influence of university library environment on student interactions and college students’ learning engagement


  • Aarts H, Dijksterhuis A (2003) The silence of the library: environment, situational norm, and social behavior. J Personality Social Psychology 84(1)

  • Abu-aisheh A, Grant L, Sumukadas N et al. (2016) Fostering engineering students engagement using problem-based learning and course learner agent object portfolios. Int J Eng Pedagog (iJEP) 6:45

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Acker SR, Miller MD (2005) Campus learning spaces: Investing in how students learn. Educause Center for Applied Research Bulletin

  • Asiyai R (2014) Students’ perception of the condition of their classroom physical learning environment and its impact on their learning and motivation. Coll Stud J 48(4):714–723


    Google Scholar
     

  • Axelson R, Flick A (2010) Defining student engagement. Chang: Mag High Learn 43(1):38–43

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ayçiçek B, Yanpar Yelken T (2018) The Effect of Flipped Classroom Model on Students’ Classroom Engagement in Teaching English. Int J Instr 11(2):385–398


    Google Scholar
     

  • Baafi R (2020) School physical environment and student academic performance. Adv Phys Educ 10(02):121

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bachman L, Bachman C (2011) A study of classroom response system clickers: Increasing student engagement and performance in a large undergraduate lecture class on architectural research. J Interact Learn Res 22(1):5–21


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bailey D (2022) Interactivity during Covid-19: mediation of learner interactions on social presence and expected learning outcome within video conference EFL courses. J Comput Educ 9(2):291–313

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baker NL, Rocklin T, Fleagle S (2007) Fostering learning through library spaces: The University of Iowa Libraries

  • Bandura A, Adams NE, Beyer J (1977) Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. J Personal Soc Psychol 35(3):125–139

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bennett S (2009) Libraries and learning: A history of paradigm change. Portal: Libraries Acad 9(2):181–197

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bennett S, Agostinho S, Lockyer L (2015) Investigating university educators’ design thinking and the implications for design support tools. J Interact Media Educ 2016(1)

  • Birdsall WF (2010) Learning commons to communicative commons: Transforming the academic library. Coll Undergrad Libraries 17(2-3):234–247

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blumenfeld P, Kempler T, Krajcik, J (2006) Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments (pp. 475–488)

  • Bodnar J (2009) Information and learning commons, faculty and student benefits. N. Libr World 110(9/10):403–409

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bond M (2020) Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Comput Educ 151:103819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Borokhovski E, Tamim R, Bernard R et al. (2012) Are contextual and designed student–student interaction treatments equally effective in distance education? Distance Educ 33(3):311–329

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brown M (2005) Learning spaces. In: Diana G, Oblinger, James L, Oblinger (Eds.). Educating the net generation. Louisville, CO: Educause, pp 121–1222

  • Carini R, Kuh G, Klein S (2006) Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Res High Educ 47(1):1–32

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carmona-Halty M, Salanova M, Llorens S et al. (2021) Linking positive emotions and academic performance: The mediated role of academic psychological capital and academic engagement. Curr Psychol 40(6):2938–2947

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carrell SE, Fullerton RL, West JE (2009) Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement. J Labor Econ 27(3):439–464

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Castilla N, Llinares C, Bravo J et al. (2017) Subjective assessment of university classroom environment. Build Environ 122:72–81

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Catherine BM (2021) O’Donnell and Tuomey’s University Architecture: Informal Learning Spaces that Enhance User Engagement. Architect Cult 9(1):98–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2020.1794711

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chan DL, Wong GK (2012) If you build it, they will come: an intra-institutional user engagement process in the Learning Commons. 2012 Chinese Digital International Symposium on Publishing and Digital Libraries, CDPDL2012, Kunming, Yunnan, China

  • Chih-Ming C (2013) An intelligent mobile location-aware book recommendation system that enhances problem-based learning in libraries. Interact Learn Environ 21(5):469–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.593525

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cole A, Lennon L, Weber NL (2021) Student perceptions of online active learning practices and online learning climate predict online course engagement. Interact Learn Environ 29(5):866–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619593

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • DeLauer V, McGill-O’Rourke A, Hayes T et al. (2022) The impact of natural environments and biophilic design as supportive and nurturing spaces on a residential college campus. Cogent Soc Sci 8(1):2000570

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Demas S (2005) From the ashes of Alexandria: What’s happening in the college library

  • Edinger EC (2019) Dörfi, söli, muesi? Widersprüchliche Environment-Behaviour-Settings in Hochschulbibliotheken. ABI Tech 39(1):9–22

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • El-Sayad G, Md Saad NH, Thurasamy R (2021) How higher education students in Egypt perceived online learning engagement and satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Comput Educ 8:527–550

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Entwistle N (2009) Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Palgrave Macmillan

  • Fang LT, Shi K, Zhang FH (2008) Research on reliability and validity of utrecht work engagement scale-student. Chin J Clin Psychol 16:618–620


    Google Scholar
     

  • Fantuzzi G, Aggazzotti G, Righi E et al. (1996) Indoor air quality in the university libraries of Modena (Italy). Sci Total Environ 193(1):49–56

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ferrer J, Ringer A, Saville K et al. (2022) Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: The importance of attitude to online learning. High Educ 83(2):317–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00657-5

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Flutter J (2006) ‘This place could help you learn’: student participation in creating better school environments. Educ Rev 58(2):183–193

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH (2004) School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res 74:59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gifford R (2007) “Environmental psychology: Principles and practice.”. Optimal Books, Colville, WA


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gómez-Cruz ME, Harari-Betancourt V, Vergara-Mendoza G (2020) Quality indicators and user satisfaction in university libraries. J Acad Librariansh 46(6):102230

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • da Graça V, Kowaltowski D, Petreche J (2007) An evaluation method for school building design at the preliminary phase with optimisation of aspects of environmental comfort for the school system of the State São Paulo in Brazil. Build Environ 42(2):984–999

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hagaman JL, Reid R (2008) The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading comprehension of middle school students at risk for failure in reading. Remedial Spec Educ 29(4):222–234

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harbaugh AG, Cavanagh RF (2012) Associations between the Classroom Learning Environment and Student Engagement in Learning 2: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Australian Association for Research in Education (NJ1)

  • Heojeong Y, Kim J, Bang D (2014) Differences in epistemological beliefs and learning style of liberal arts and natural science students and relationship between epistemological beliefs and learning style. J Curric Educ 18(4):989–1009


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hernoff DJ, Csikszentmihalyi M, Schneider B et al. (2014) Student Engagement in High School Classrooms from the Perspective of Flow Theory. In: Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education, Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9094-9_24

  • Hin L, Fan L, Boysu W (2018) Impacts of library space on learning satisfaction-An empirical study of university library design in Guangzhou. China. The. J Acad Librariansh 44(6):724–737

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hu J, Zhang M (2015) Research on the Construction of Liberal Arts Graduate Student Learning Situation–A Case Study of the Tourism Management Major in Guangdong Province. High Educ Stud 5(2):1–9


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hunley S, Schaller M (2009) Assessment the key to creating spaces that promote learning. Educ Rev 44:26–35


    Google Scholar
     

  • Isohätälä J, Näykki P, Järvelä S (2020) Cognitive and socio-emotional interaction in collaborative learning: Exploring fluctuations in students’ participation. Scand J Educ Res 64(6):831–851

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jiang XY (2014) Strengthening students’ cognitive input and improving teaching quality in universities. J Sci Educ (Zhongjian) 24:25–26. https://doi.org/10.16400/j.cnki.kjdkz.2014.12.091

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jie L, Daniel C (2014) The effect of social interaction on learning engagement in a social networking environment. Interact Learn Environ 22(4):401–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.680966

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Karol E, Mackintosh L (2011) Analysing the Lack of Student Engagement in the Sustainability Agenda: A Case Study in Teaching Architecture. International Journal of Learning 17(10)

  • Kaya C, Blake J, Chan F (2015) Peer-mediated interventions with elementary and secondary school students with emotional and behavioural disorders: A literature review. J Res Spec Educ Needs 15(2):120–129

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim H, Son D (2021) Effects of Learner-to-Learner Academic and Social-Emotional Interactions on Learning Engagement and Cooperative Learning Satisfaction in Online Cooperative Learning. J Educ Sci 52(4):27–49


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lekissa A, Hsiu-Ling C (2021) The influence of motivation on learning engagement: the mediating role of learning self-efficacy and self-monitoring in online learning environments. Interact Learn Environ https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1977962

  • Kop R, Fournier H, Mak J (2011) A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 12(7):74–93. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i7.1041

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kuh GD (2009) What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Coll Stud Dev 50:683–706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kuh GD, Gonyea RM (2003) The role of the academic library in promoting student engagement in learning. Coll Res Libraries 64(4):256–282

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kwon KK, Chung HM (2018) An analysis of relationship among academic self-efficacy, task value, learning engagement, academic achievement and learning satisfaction in the flipped learning environment. J Educ Technol 34(3):407–439

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lei X (2022) The impact of emotion management ability on learning engagement of college students during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 13

  • Li L, Yang Y, Hao Y, Wang W (2019) Development and validation of a measurement scale for college students’ English reading engagement. Foreign Lang Electron Teach 6:39–45


    Google Scholar
     

  • Li LH, Wu F, Su B (2018) Impacts of library space on learning satisfaction–An empirical study of university library design in Guangzhou, China. The. J Acad Librariansh 44(6):724–737

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li X, Huang R (2010) Revision report of the University Student Engagement Scale (UWES-S). Psychol Res 1:84–88


    Google Scholar
     

  • Li Y, Lerner RM (2011) Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Dev Psychol 47:233–247

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu H, Yao M, Li R, Zhang L (2020) The relationship between regulatory focus and learning engagement among Chinese adolescents. Educ Psychol 40(4):430–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.161844

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lu K, Shi Y, Li J et al. (2022) An investigation of college students’ learning engagement and classroom preferences under the smart classroom environment. SN Comput Sci 3:205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01093-1

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lu K, Yang H, Shi Y et al. (2020) Examining the effects of the 5E instructional model on college students’ higher-order thinking skills, peer interaction and learning achievement. In 2020 Ninth International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology 188–192

  • Luan L, Hong JC, Cao M et al. (2020) Exploring the role of online EFL learners perceived social support in their learning engagement: a structural equation model. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1855211

  • Ma G, Fu G (2021) Research on Influencing Factors of College Students’ Learning Engagement Based on SPSS24.0. 2021 International Conference on Education, Information Management and Service Science (EIMSS), Xi’an, China, 2021, pp 205-208, IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EIMSS53851.2021.00051

  • Macpherson A (2015) Cooperative learning group activities for college courses. Kwantlen Polytechnic University

  • Mader S, Bry F (2019) Fun and engagement in lecture halls through social gamification. Int J Eng Pedagog (iJEP) 9:113

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mahbuba R (2022) The role of student-student interaction in efl classrooms. Евразийский журнал социальных наук, философии и культуры 2(2):63–66


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mannerström R, Muotka J, Salmela-Aro K (2019) Associations between identity processes and success in developmental tasks during the transition from emerging to young adulthood. J Youth Stud 22(9):1289–1307

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Manwaring KC (2017) Emotional and cognitive engagement in higher education classrooms. Brigham Young University

  • Massengale L, Piotrowski P, Savage D (2016) Identifying and articulating library connections to student success. Coll Res Libraries 77(2):227–235

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Matthews KE, Andrews V, Adams P (2011) Social learning spaces and student engagement. High Educ Res Dev 30:105–120

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Miao J, Chang J, Ma L (2022) Teacher–student interaction, student–student interaction and social presence: their impacts on learning engagement in online learning environments. J Genet Psychol 183(6):514–526

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mizani H, Cahyadi A, Hendryadi H (2022) Loneliness, student engagement, and academic achievement during emergency remote teaching during COVID-19: the role of the God locus of control. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 9:305

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Montgomery SE (2014) Library space assessment: User learning behaviors in the library. J Acad Librariansh 40(1):70–75

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nitecki DA (2011) Space assessment as a venue for defining the academic library. Libr Q 81:27–59

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oblinger D (2004) Leading the transition from classrooms to learning spaces. An NLII(National Learning Infrastructure Initiative) white paper

  • Oliveras-Ortiz Y, Bouillion DE, Asbury L (2019) Listening to high school students: Purposefully designed spaces and the impact on students’ engagement in learning

  • Parsons J, Taylor L (2011) Improving student engagement. Current issues in education 14(1)

  • Peng L, Wei W, Fan W et al. (2022) Student Experience and Satisfaction in Academic Libraries: A Comparative Study among Three Universities in Wuhan. Buildings 12(5):682

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pintrich PR, De Groot, Elisabeth V (1990) Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. J Educ Psychol 82(1):33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Poldin O, Valeeva D, Yudkevich M (2016) Which peers matter: How social ties affect peer-group effects. Res High Educ 57(4):448–468

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Puritat K (2019) Enhanced knowledge and engagement of students through the gamification concept of game elements. Int J Eng Pedagog (iJEP) 9:41

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Quadir B, Yang JC, Chen NS (2022) The effects of interaction types on learning outcomes in a blog-based interactive learning environment. Interact Learn Environ 30(2):293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1652835

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ravindran B, Greene BA, DeBacker TK (2005) Predicting preservice teachers’ cognitive engagement with goals and epistemological beliefs. J Educ Res 98(4):222–233. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.4.222-233

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rubin J (1975) What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Q 9(1):41–51

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Salanova M, Llorens S, Cifre E et al. (2003) Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well-being and task performance among electronic work groups: An experimental study. Small Group Res 34(1):43–73

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Salmela-Aro K, Upadyaya K (2012) The school work engagement inventory: Energy, dedication and absorption (EDA). Eur J Psychol Assess 28:60–67

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Salmela-Aro K, Upadyaya K (2014) School burnout and engagement in the context of demands–resources model. Br J Educ Psychol 84:137–151

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schultz PW, Kaiser FG (2012) Promoting pro-environmental behavior.” In V. Murphy (Ed.), “Handbook of environmental conservation. New York, NY: Routledge 575-600

  • Scott-Webber L, Konyndyk R, French R, French J (2018) Significant results. Space makes a difference increasing student academic engagement levels. Eur Sci J 14(16):1857–7881


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sher A (2009) Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in web-based online learning environment. J Interact Online Learn 8(2)

  • Shernoff DJ (2013) Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement

  • Shwu-yong LH, Fisher DL (2011) Associations of the university learning environment with academic engagement and satisfaction among science majors in Taiwan. Asia-Pac Educ Res 20(2):1–1


    Google Scholar
     

  • Spector JM, Kim C (2014) Technologies for intentional learning: Beyond a cognitive perspective. Aust J Educ 58(1):9–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944113517828

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stewart J (2021) Understanding the Impact of Faculty Mentorship on Student Motivation to Participate in Experiential Learning Within the Sports Management Curriculum: A Phenomenological Study

  • Sze-yeng F, Hussain RMR (2010) Self-directed learning in a socio constructivist learning environment. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 9:1913–1917

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tatiana B, Kobicheva A, Tokareva E (2022) The relationship between students’ psychological security level, academic engagement and performance variables in the digital educational environment. Educ Inf Technol 27:9385–9399

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT


    Google Scholar
     

  • Thomas B, Van HS, Jacobson W et al. (2015) The design and assessment of the Learning Commons at the University of Iowa. J Acad Librariansh 41(6):804–813

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Trowler V (2010) Student engagement literature review. High Educ Acad 11(1):1–15


    Google Scholar
     

  • Tuominen-Soini H, Salmela-Aro K (2014) School work engagement and burnout among Finnish high school students and young adults: Profles, progressions, and educational outcomes. Dev Psychol 50:649–662

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ubon NA, Kimble C (2003) Supporting the creation of social presence in online learning communities using asynchronous text-based CMC. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on technology in teaching and learning in higher education, pp 295–300

  • Wang L (2009) Social network analysis of virtual learning communities. China’s e-Learn 02:5–11. CNKI:SUN:ZDJY.0.2009-02-003


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang MT, Peck SC (2013) Adolescent educational success and mental health vary across school engagement profles. Dev Psychol 49:1266–1276

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Webb NM (1983) Predicting learning from student interaction: Defining the interaction variables. Educ Psychol 18(1):33–41

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Webb NM (1985) Student interaction and learning in small groups: A research summary. In Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 147-172)

  • Widemalm E (2016) Buildings for inspiration and learning: University libraries as study environments: A case study of Carolina Library, Frescati Library and Södertörn University Library

  • Wu D, Yu L, Yang T et al. (2020) The impacts of uncertainty stress on mental disorders of Chinese college students: evidence from a nationwide study. Front Psychol 11:243

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu H, Li S, Zheng J et al. (2020) Medical students’ motivation and academic performance: The mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement. Med Educ Online 25(1):1742964

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xie K, Vongkulluksn VW, Lu L et al. (2020) A person-centered approach to examining high-school students’ motivation, engagement and academic performance. Contemp Educ Psychol 62:101877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101877

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang J, Peng MY, Wong S et al. (2021) How E-learning environmental stimuli influence determinates of learning engagement in the context of COVID-19? SOR model perspective

  • Yi X, Zhan Z, Ma S (2022) An evaluation model of MOOC learning engagement based on learning behaviors and social network analysis. In 2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Educational Technology (ICET) (pp. 165–169). IEEE

  • Zhang Z (2019) The effect of library indoor environments on occupant satisfaction and performance in Chinese universities using SEMs. Build Environ 150:322–329

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao H, Xiong J, Zhang Z et al. (2021) Growth mindset and college students’ learning engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: A serial mediation model. Front Psychol 12:621094

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhu Z, Wang J, Zhang W, Ye Q (2005) Construction of the scale for college students’ autonomous learning. Psychol Dev Educ 21(3):60–65

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhu H, Zhu Y (2013) A discussion on the flipped classroom and its effective implementation strategies (Doctoral dissertation)



  • Read More